Sewage Sludge on Farms Threatens Water Supply

sludge_attPhoto via flickr user SuSanA SecretariatWould you mind if your neighbors were using treated human waste instead of animal manure as a crop fertilizer? Residents in Pennsylvania, where the practice has been on the incline recently, are concerned that the use of sewage sludge on farmland has contaminated local water sources and has kept people inside to escape the smell.

The Morning Call reports:

Lynn Township residents want neighboring farmers to stop using sludge to grow crops, a practice residents say is polluting their water supply and leaving a stench in the air. Dozens of residents packed a Lynn meeting in January after traces of fecal coliform and E.coli were discovered in a resident's well. Though no evidence was found linking the bacteria to neighboring farms, residents say their wells were clean before the sludge was spread.

According to state authorities, the sludge – which has been spread on more than 1500 sites around the state in the last 20 years – doesn't pose any hazards and is monitored to meet federal and state regulations.

Controversy has followed the use of sludge on farms since the practice began in the 1990s, according to SourceWatch. After the government banned dumping sewage sludge into the ocean or incinerating it, the sewage industry had to find alternatives … and gained the EPA's blessing to dispose sludge on farmland instead. It also effectively rebranded the term from "sludge" to a more attractive industry term "biosolids," now frequently marketed as compost without any reference that it came from processed human and industrial waste.

A Penn State extension specialist, Luke LaBorde, said that "standards for the enforcement and application of biosolids are murky." An article in a new edition of Environment International reports that biosolids from California and North Carolina had concentrations of flame retardants, triclosan and other chemicals that "have the potential to migrate out of consumer products and enter the outdoor environment."

It seems like there is a lot of public awareness that needs to be raised concerning this issue, including from the government, which ultimately contracts companies that haul sludge from city wastewater treatment plants to farmers (who are paid to accept it). Hmmm…too many conflicts of interest there? No wonder there's little oversight.

For more on this topic, check out The Center for Media and Democracy's FoodRightsNetwork.

Sarah Damian is New Media Associate for the Government Accountability Project, the nation's leading whistleblower protection and advocacy organization.

 

Comments (7)

  1. The children's book has it right: Everyone Poops. Most people don't take any personal steps to manage this, but for the flush of the toilet. The agencies that manage this product on behalf of the flushing public employ staff who hold themselves entirely accountable for the environmental outcomes in service to the public and environment. I invite you to go to your local agency and discover that for yourself. Misinformation about sludge is repeated so frequently that it becomes self-validating. It also sadly feeds a fear that is unnecessary. Your local sewage worker should be your primary environmental hero for the work they do around the clock for the protection of public health and the waters. The "Facts," which are not facts, prey on an undeserved, cynical myth of malevolent government.
  2. Facts:
    1) Sewage Sludge can "rebloom" (even class A, the "clean" stuff")
    2) Bacteria remain in the environmnent for months, if not years after being sludged
    3) Depending on site, the bacteria can make it to the aquifer polluting ground water
    4) Bacteria and pollution from sludge can become airborn and depending on atmospheric conditions, can travel for miles contaminating area around the site
    5) Plants uptake the metals from sewage sludge - if these plants are destined for human consumption, humans get nice healthy dose as well
    6) PR industry is running rampent trying to protect this practice - no state is safe; with the advent of social media, the polluters are scrambling to stop the backlash tidal wave of negative information.
    7) Encroachment (rural to city) brings more and more complaints nationwide, everyday
    8) Those with breathing problems may experience extreme breathing problems when living near or driving by freshly sludged field (especially asthmatics)
    9) Sludge has killed cows
    10) Sludge has rendered farmland completely useless (GA)
    11) To be "certified organic" in US, sludge must not be used on farm (this is only way to protect yourself from sewage industry)
    12) CDC is presently studying if the Cantaloupe listeria outbreak last year that killed over 20 people and sickened 100's could have come from a sludge field directly across street of cantaloupe processing plant.
    13) Counties across the country are actively passing ordinances to ban sludgeing practice within their borders
    14) Sludge can contain radioactive-isotopes from cancer patients, fracking, etc

    Spin all u want - facts dont lie.
  3. William, thanks for contributing to the discussion. Transparency and accountability are the major missing factors that FIC is trying to bring to the dialogue. Whether or not the crops are being raised for humans or animals, they still have an effect on the surrounding ecosystem and, if the animals are food-producing, the source of our food supply. E.coli and several other tested pathogens found in sewage sludge are worrisome, but thousands of other pathogens commonly found in this product are not monitored. It's hard to discern the safety when there are so many unknowns. Economic benefits for farmers are great, but not when there are potential risks to public health.
  4. Therese - Thanks for your comments. It's unfortunate how complicated it clearly is to ensure a safe water supply. FIC feels that people shouldn't have to go to such tasks to investigate and keep their families and communities healthy. The fact that farmers are being provided with potentially toxic sewage sludge for use on their crops as part of a government program speaks to why regulations over this issue may be lax, and inspection minimal. With little public knowledge on what is a national public health concern, there is a clear need for whistleblowers who have experience first-hand on what's going on to share their insight.
  5. The recycling of sewage sludge in Linn Township, Pennsylvania, covered in the article in the Morning Call, is a beneficial program for providing nutrients and organic matter to farmers growing field crops. The newspaper account gave a misleading impression that the farmers were growing vegetables for humans. This is not the case. The farmers are growing crops destined to animals. The farmers use biosolids as a replacement for chemical fertilizers, in a regulatorily-approved program that benefits economically-challenged farmers and customers of community waste water treatment facilities. There is no scientifically plausible pathway between biosolids and the reported E coli in the resident's wells. Scientific investigation of microbial contamination from biosolids recycling has shown that such risks are negligible. The tens of thousands of professionals (including scientists and regulators) who treat human sewage in the United States are no less committed to environmental quality and public health than those who work at the Food Integrity Campaign. The public has been, and continues to be, very well served by its investment in waste water treatment infrastructure. The Linn Township residents deserve to be reassured that their environment is safe, rather than have their fears unnecessarily inflamed.
  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »
Page 1 of 2

      • >:o
      • :-[
      • :'(
      • :-(
      • :-D
      • :-*
      • :-)
      • :P
      • :\
      • 8-)
      • ;-)

    •